Calendar

December 2016
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 << <Jun 2017> >>
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Announce

Who's Online?

Member: 0
Visitor: 1

rss Syndication

Posts sent on: 2001-01-01

30 Dec 2015 

A complete Prima Facie Empirically Verifiable Scientific
Method
Driven Graphical Target System Analysis and 
Conclusion arrived at by Process of Elimination





"Analogical models are a method of representing a phenomenon of the world, often called the 'target system', by another, more understandable or analysable system." - Wikipedia


The exceptionless condition required for gravitational acceleration to occur has been known for centuries....




....the condition under which a body is, literally, free to fall under the influence of the local gravitational field with no resistance to its acceleration....


 


The control that appears on the right in many of the animations is intended as a reminder of that, and also signals the beginning of a comparison....





We can still know with certainty what condition exists beneath an object as it falls....





....even though we may not be able to see into the space beneath it as it does....





Buckled columns, whether one or a hundred, whether one at a time or all at once (or any combination thereof) won't just go from 100% to 0% when they buckle, they'll steadily decrease in strength while they buckle and that takes time....





The mechanism of buckling (a mode of natural progressive structural failure), whether caused by heat....


 


....or by overloading....


 


....or by other modes of natural progressive structural failure such as impact induced fracturing....





....or fracturing caused by overloading....


 


....or any other mode or combination of modes of natural progressive structural failure absolutely cannot match or create the exceptionless condition required for gravitational acceleration to occur, it's literally impossible (except for bridges and other structures that pass through air wherein the condition required for free fall to occur exists inherently as a structural feature). There is no such thing as structural gravitational acceleration....


 


The progressive collapse of the building (NIST probable collapse sequence starting with column 79 on the left)....


 


....that essentially happens all at once....


 


....is clearly physically inconsistent with what we empirically know of natural progressive structural failure (defined as a time consuming process of individual/sequential/simultaneous failure involving one or a number of related structural components). It's a physical impossibility for the lower part of the asymmetrically damaged building (reportedly three core columns and nine perimeter columns)....


 


....to have naturally progressively collapsed in any way that could result in the upper part of the building symmetrically descending as a single unit straight down through itself (NIST probable collapse sequence starting with column 79 circled below) at anything near gravitational acceleration for any period of time....


 


Any building collapse scenario like that seen playing out below resulting from a natural progressive structural failure of a steel frame building including a 105 foot 2.25 second period of gravitational acceleration of the upper part of the building as a single unit is an absolute physical impossibility....


 


....and there is absolutely no mode or combination of modes of natural progressive structural failure driven solely by gravity that can ever match or give rise to the exceptionless condition required for free fall to have occurred at any point during it's descent....


 


The scenario playing out below is an absolute physical impossibility. Just as there is no such thing as structural gravitational acceleration, nor is there any structural failure mode known as natural progressive structural gravitational acceleration....


 


There is simply no point during a natural progressive gravity driven collapse of any steel frame skyscraper where one could say....



"Hold it.... right there! That's the point where all the steel columns and structural components that were supporting the building just a moment ago (with an area greater than that of a football field) will undoubtedly be found to be behaving in a manner very much like air (below left). It will take very careful calculation to tell the fall times apart during this free fall period of the ongoing natural progressive structural failure (below right)"....


 


For the 105 foot 2.25 second period of time that we know the upper part of the building literally fell as a single unit at gravitational acceleration we know it can not have been using any of it's potential energy to crush the building contents, columns and other structural components beneath it and undergo gravitational acceleration at the same time (as illustrated by this frangible impedance scenario)....


 


It's physically impossible for the lower asymmetrically damaged part of the building to have naturally progressively collapsed in any way that could result in the upper part of the building actually accelerating as it descended symmetrically straight down through itself as a single unit through the path of maximum resistance (below right), and then, driven on solely by gravity, actually continue to accelerate so nearly to gravitational acceleration (below left) as to require very careful calculation for any difference between the two to be detected....


 


Some other force powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the upper part of the building as it descended must be introduced to explain the observed rate of descent during the 2.25 second period of gravitational acceleration. For the 2.25 seconds that the building literally fell at gravitational acceleration, no other force powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the upper part of the building was seen to be introduced from outside the building, and no other force powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the upper part of the building is known to have existed inside the building as an element or normal function of it's infrastructure. For a load supported by a column to descend at gravitational acceleration, all support must be quickly removed, there's absolutely no other way. It must be knocked out, pulled out, blown out, vaporized etc. Since no eight story tall boulders were seen rumbling through Manhatten that day that could have quickly knocked out all support....


 


....and no suspicious looking Frenchmen were spotted rigging for verinage (another form of controlled demolition) the night before that could have quickly pulled out all support....


 


....and no bombs or rockets were seen to be dropped on/fired at it that could have quickly blown out all support....


 


....and no giant laser beams or other secret weapons were being tested in the area that could have quickly vaporized all support....


 


....and no other force capable of quickly removing all support from beneath the upper part of the building existed in the building as a normal function of it's infrastructure (blue)....


 


....it naturally follows that whatever the other force was that must be introduced to explain the observed 105 foot 2.25 second period of gravitional acceleration of the upper part of the building as a single unit, it must have been introduced some time before the event, and unless it can be shown how the other force that must be introduced either during or just before the collapse of the building was introduced from outside the building, or that it was already existing inside the building as a normal function of it's infrastructure, the process of elimination really leaves only one possible explanation for the building's behaviour. Some energetic material powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the upper part of the building during the 105 foot 2.25 second period of gravitational acceleration must have been physically transported inside the building some time before the event, it had to be brought in. The explosion model is the only one....


 


....that can realistically match and empirically be expected to create the exceptionless condition that we know must have existed....


 


....beneath the literally falling visible upper part of the building as a single unit during its observed largely symmetrical descent at gravitational acceleration for approximately 105 feet in 2.25 seconds....


 


The undisputed (both the NIST and independent researchers alike agree) observation of a significant well defined period of gravitational acceleration of the upper part of the building as a single unit....


 


Stage 1 (0 to 1.75 seconds): acceleration less than that of gravity (i.e., slower than free fall).



Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall).


During Stage 2, the north face descended essentially (displaying all the absolutely necessary, extremely important features) in free fall (any motion of a body where gravity is the only force acting upon it), indicating negligible (so small or unimportant as to be not worth considering, insignificant) support from the structure below.



Stage 3 (4.0 to 5.4 seconds): decreased acceleration, again less than that of gravity.


 


....means that an explosion, or a number of explosions, must have occurred that was powerful enough to quickly remove all support from beneath the upper part of the building (below right), either all at once or incrementally in advance of its descent, permitting it to descend at gravitational acceleration as a single unit for the observed period and under the exceptionless condition required (below left) for gravitational acceleration to occur....


 


The building was brought down by explosives.



The empirically established fact that WTC7 was brought down by explosives immediately shines a bright spotlight on literally the only ones on the planet that could possibly have carried out a covert domestic operation of that magnitude in that building (and by extension all the events of that day).... the only ones who had exclusive 24/7 access to all parts of the highly secured building.... the only ones who had ready access to the quantity and quality of energetic materials required.... and the only ones who could have defeated the high level security of the building in order to allow in those with the required expertise in the effective use of said energetic materials. The fact is that only the Department of Defense/Central Intelligence Agency could've done it. And just as one needn't be Isaac Newton to see there is no other possible explanation for the behavior of WTC7 other than energetic materials having been physically transported inside the building, one needn't be Sherlock Holmes to see there is no other possible explanation as to who could have done it since the building was in perpetual lock down for many years as a highly secured government facility.... it's elementary.


Admin · 123 views · Leave a comment

1, 2  Next page